| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Making deals in ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Pahah Pahineh wrote: Capqu wrote: Pahah Pahineh wrote: If it weren't for double standards, CCP would have no standards at all. A bit harsh. I appreciate you are probably one of the people affected by injustice past, but CCP haven't pub...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.11 09:56:00
|
2. Referees, do your job! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Darek Castigatus wrote: Pahah Pahineh wrote: Takakura Hirohito wrote: Rules were put into place to make ATX more competitive and enjoyable to watch than previous tournaments. I see you're labouring under this initial misinformation. On...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.10 12:00:00
|
3. Referees, do your job! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Takakura Hirohito wrote: Rules were put into place to make ATX more competitive and enjoyable to watch than previous tournaments. I see you're labouring under this initial misinformation. One could check Sreegs' deleted posts to find out why...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.10 11:07:00
|
4. Making deals in ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Capqu wrote: Pahah Pahineh wrote: If it weren't for double standards, CCP would have no standards at all. A bit harsh. I appreciate you are probably one of the people affected by injustice past, but CCP haven't published the qualified tea...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.10 11:02:00
|
5. Making deals in ATX - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
If it weren't for double standards, CCP would have no standards at all.
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.10 10:49:00
|
6. So what is the punishment for metagaming? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
op, TEST isn't Hydra so the rules don't apply, you can't seriously believe any of those rules are for anybody else? They have said on record many many times that those rules were brought in specifically for Hydra. It's a shame they didn't let Hydr...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.08 11:30:00
|
7. What a shame! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Tony Two Bullet wrote: Because they don't have a sponsor this year? That's not really a source, it's speculation. nVidia don't really put a price on supplying a couple of gfx cards as prizes to get their name all over, so I'd be surprised a...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.06 18:26:00
|
8. What a shame! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
It happened because people have a sense of entitlement to alliance tournament final of the kind they desire (monotonous thrash of some unknown by some partially known) without putting in any effort themselves. Should that not occur, they will chee...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.06 13:40:00
|
9. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Whatever anybody wants to do is fine. Right now CCP enjoy the support of the community and the community stands a chance in the tournament because the only real threat CCP removed. Everybody is currently very happy indeed. Would CCP rock that boa...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.05 11:31:00
|
10. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: Pahah Pahineh wrote: At least now we know you haven't even read the rules. I did, you didn't. Quote: We will be actively removing those alliances that try and add a GÇÿBGÇÖ or GÇÿCGÇÖ team That's using the future te...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 19:59:00
|
11. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Khanh'rhh wrote: Pahah Pahineh wrote: Markus Reese wrote: Well, the rules stipulated that any form of arranged combat will result in forfeiture from the tourney. Also the refs for the fight have the right to call a match over if it seemed...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 14:49:00
|
12. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Markus Reese wrote: Well, the rules stipulated that any form of arranged combat will result in forfeiture from the tourney. Also the refs for the fight have the right to call a match over if it seemed such. I am pretty sure that the conga line ...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 10:58:00
|
13. THESE COMMENTATORS ARE TERRIBLE - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
CCP took tens of thousands of dollars as entry fees for the tournament and commentators are volunteering their time to this. I think that makes them extremely charitable and yet hugely misguided, but it's their choice to make. Either step up, or s...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 09:48:00
|
14. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Bacchanalian wrote: Intigo alt spotted. A swing and a miss. Bacchanalian wrote: In the past ransoming/buying ships has not as far as I can tell been against the rules, but it coud have changed. Nothing has changed. You're either in ...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 09:44:00
|
15. PL were banned from ATX right ? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Hydra and outbreak were never in the tournament, but were banned prior to even entering. It's hard to see how they broke a rule to a tournament they weren't even listed in. But it's what the community wanted and more importantly, it's what Soundw...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 09:34:00
|
16. Yawntournament - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
I personally liked that setup with all the Vangels and Malices, sadly CCP decided that somebody winning the Tourney with a single fleet comp wasn't in any of your best interests. And you agreed.
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 09:32:00
|
17. metagaming CCP clarification - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Are you Hydra Alliance? No. Therefore whatever you do is fine.
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.07.02 09:29:00
|
18. ***Alliance Tourny (Test is PL sleeper team)*** - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Neither of the alliances you mention are limited to around 30 people with the ability to completely handle the rest of the alliances that have 30 thousand people. So they don't need undue punishment. k? It's pretty simple really. Suck, or be bann...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.06.30 14:34:00
|
19. name wrong - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Your candor and good humour indicates you may be misunderestimating Soundwave's butthurt and Sreegs resolve to tell the most horrific lies to corrupt this tournament in favour of their usual suspects. You should retract such statements immediately...
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.06.29 00:20:00
|
20. The Winner's Challenge! - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Soundwave would just have Sreegs make up some lies to ban whoever they feel the need to and then declare they won. We've seen it all before, we'll see it all again.
- by Pahah Pahineh - at 2012.06.28 09:26:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |